Gallery
PM Modi visit USA
Only the mirror in my washroom and phone gallery see the crazy me : Sara Khan
Karnataka rain fury: Photos of flooded streets, uprooted trees
Cannes 2022: Deepika Padukone stuns at the French Riviera in Sabyasachi outfit
Ranbir Kapoor And Alia Bhatt's Wedding Pics - Sealed With A Kiss
Oscars 2022: Every Academy Award Winner
Shane Warne (1969-2022): Australian cricket legend's life in pictures
Photos: What Russia's invasion of Ukraine looks like on the ground
Lata Mangeshkar (1929-2022): A pictorial tribute to the 'Nightingale of India'
PM Modi unveils 216-feet tall Statue of Equality in Hyderabad (PHOTOS)
Indian men's hockey team captain Harmanpreet Singh has been named Player of the Year 2024
- World Boxing medallist Gaurav Bidhuri to flag off 'Delhi Against Drugs' movement on Nov 17
- U23 World Wrestling Championship: Chirag Chikkara wins gold as India end campaign with nine medals
- FIFA president Infantino confirms at least 9 African teams for the 2026 World Cup
- Hockey, cricket, wrestling, badminton, squash axed from 2026 CWG in Glasgow
- FIFA : Over 100 female footballers urge FIFA to reconsider partnership with Saudi oil giant
SC refuses to cancel CLAT-2020, asks petitioners to represent to panel Last Updated : 09 Oct 2020 04:10:49 PM IST 
File Photo The Supreme Court on Friday declined to cancel the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT-2020) this year or stay the counselling process.
A bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan said it was of the view that the petitioners should submit their grievances to the grievances redressal committee for an early decision on the complaints.The observations came on a plea by five candidates who sought quashing of the exam due to alleged technical glitches.The CLAT -- a centralised national entrance test for admissions to National Law Universities (NLUs) in the country -- was held on September 28.Senior lawyer PS Narasimha, representing a consortium of NLUs, submitted that the grievance redressal committee headed by a former Chief Justice can consider the issues raised by the petitioners.The bench told senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayan representing the petitioners that it can't stop the counselling process.Sankaranarayan cited technical glitches during the online exam, adding that certain questions were not correct and the software did not record some answers correctly.He also cited lack of response from the consortium of NLUs on around 19,000 objections. He submitted before the bench that for the first time, only 3 per cent students have crossed the 50 per cent of the total 150 marks.Narasimha, opposing the contention, said there cannot be unending counselling for admissions in the backdrop of the ongoing pandemic and insisted that unnecessary complaints have been raised.Citing the contentious questions in the exam, he added that 146th and 150th questions attracted a lot of objections and were later dropped as per an expert committee's recommendation.The top court concluded the hearing by saying: "We give liberty to the petitioners to make a representation before the committee within two days."The bench also said that a decision on the matter should be taken at the earliest.IANS New Delhi For Latest Updates Please-
Join us on
Follow us on
What binds the two most talked about nations - India and Pakistan together? What makes the
Kajal on Children Day : Actress Kajol took to social media to wish her kids, son Yug and d
LG Electronics Inc said on Wednesday that it will introduce new C with its artificial inte
172.31.16.186
