Gallery
- PM Modi visit USAOnly the mirror in my washroom and phone gallery see the crazy me : Sara KhanKarnataka rain fury: Photos of flooded streets, uprooted treesCannes 2022: Deepika Padukone stuns at the French Riviera in Sabyasachi outfitRanbir Kapoor And Alia Bhatt's Wedding Pics - Sealed With A KissOscars 2022: Every Academy Award WinnerShane Warne (1969-2022): Australian cricket legend's life in picturesPhotos: What Russia's invasion of Ukraine looks like on the groundLata Mangeshkar (1929-2022): A pictorial tribute to the 'Nightingale of India'PM Modi unveils 216-feet tall Statue of Equality in Hyderabad (PHOTOS)
Indian men's hockey team captain Harmanpreet Singh has been named Player of the Year 2024
- World Boxing medallist Gaurav Bidhuri to flag off 'Delhi Against Drugs' movement on Nov 17
- U23 World Wrestling Championship: Chirag Chikkara wins gold as India end campaign with nine medals
- FIFA president Infantino confirms at least 9 African teams for the 2026 World Cup
- Hockey, cricket, wrestling, badminton, squash axed from 2026 CWG in Glasgow
- FIFA : Over 100 female footballers urge FIFA to reconsider partnership with Saudi oil giant
HC refuses to stay Delhi govt's corona fee on liquor Last Updated : 15 May 2020 02:27:03 PM IST liquor (file pic) In a big setback to the booze lovers in the national capital, the Delhi High Court on Friday refused to grant an interim stay on the Arvind Kejriwal government's notification imposing a 70 per cent 'Special Corona Fee' on the MRP of all liquor brands in the national capital.
A bench of Chief Justice D. N. Patel and Justice C. Harishankar issued notice to the Delhi government seeking its response over a batch of petitions challenging the May 4 order of the Arvind Kejriwal-led AAP government imposing the extra cost.The court has now posted the matter for hearing on May 29. Ramesh Singh, appearing for the Delhi government told the court that a detailed response would be filed by the next date of hearing.The orders were passed while the court was dealing with a batch of petitions challenging the Delhi government's notification imposing the 70 per cent fee on liquor's MRP and seeking a stay on the same.Lalit Valecha by way of his petition said that the move to impose a 70 per cent Special Corona Fee is "without the authority of law and is in a most arbitrary manner affecting the interests of various residents and citizens of Delhi, especially in the time of the prevailing crisis.""The impugned notification also results into double, jeopardy to the consumers of liquor in the state of Delhi as the Special Corona Fee is payable over and above the MRP which is already inclusive of various taxes, duties and levies by the government. Further, the purpose or intent for which the said fee has been imposed has no correlation with the services being rendered by the State Government i.e. the sale of liquor or any direct benefit to the payers of the said 'fee' and thus, such a highly exaggerated levy under the guise of a 'Special Fee' without any supportive calculation or any reference to expenditure in providing such a service is arbitrary, unreasonable and bad in law,"The plea further said that imposing a hefty fee of 70 per cent as "Special Corona Fees" upon the residents of Delhi buying liquor/alcoholic drinks is arbitrary and has resulted in hardship to the residents of Delhi. "The intent behind imposing such fee is not to curtail the sale of liquor and is for revenue generation as has been repeatedly expressed by the Delhi Government in media briefings," it said."The Respondents (Delhi government) have no power or authority under any law to amend the Delhi Excise Rules of 2010 in the aforesaid manner and to impose such a special fee without any justification in the prevailing times by misusing the taxing powers of the state as an after-thought. The Respondents has exceeded the authority granted by the Constitution of India and thus, the indulgence and intervention of this Hon'ble Court is imperative and it is humbly prayed that the impugned notification and order dated 04.05.2020 be quashed/set aside," the petitioner prayed.IANS New Delhi For Latest Updates Please-
Join us on
Follow us on
172.31.16.186